Web 2.What?

Friday, October 26th, 2007

I’ve been mulling over this post for a while now. I have a feeling half of my fellow marketers will appluad this post, while the other half will blog about how wrong I truly am. I vowed a long time ago that these words would never be a part of my vocabulary – but here we go.

Web 2.0, Web 3.0… What do these really meaning? Well according to Wikipeda, Web 2.0 refers to a perceived second generation of web-based communities and hosted services — such as social-networking sites, wikis and folksonomies — which aim to facilitate collaboration and sharing between users.

Web 3.0 is a term that is used to describe various evolution of Web usage and interaction along several separate paths including transforming the web into a database.

Say what?

In my personal opinion Web 2.0 and 3.0 are just made up terms that refef to websites and campaigns that are interactive and engaging and encourage “audience” participation. As simple as that. That’s something I think most people can relate to.

And when you can relate to something, it doesn’t seem that scary.

Clients may not get the technology involved or understand how to create these experiences, but you don’t need to throw a bunch of terms at them designed to make heads spin.

Our value as interactive marketers is the understanding, knowledge and passion we bring to the space. There are many different tactics and ways to create and execute sites and campaigns, knowing best practices for each of those and how to tie that into a winning strategy for the client is what we should be spending our time on; not using jargon that goes over heads or determining what web 4.0 is going to include.

What Does the Writer’s Guild Strike Mean for Online?

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007

The Writer’s Guild of America voted overwhemingly in favour of striking last week, potentially as early as Nov. 1 – but likely not until the Spring.

What is at the heart of this potential strike? Fees for dvd sales and of course, internet downloads/content.

Let’s put aside the fact that we’ll all be forced to watch nothing but reality tv shows for who knows how long if this happens; and look at what this means for the web – if anything.

If there’s no tv to watch, there’s no downloads – or is there? In this generation of the over-cliched “Content is King,” era let’s look at where most of the content comes from. YOU – the user. User-generated content has been around longer than one might imagine but has grown significantly in popularity over the last few years with the help of sites like YouTube.

Put aside whether or not you like user generated content for a moment – and just think of this. With no good tv to watch, audiences will flock to the web (and/or hopefully outside for extra exercise) to find great content to occupy their time. If there’s no content to download, users will just make their own and the internet will keep on humming. I’m sure we’ll see spoofs popping up of favourite tv shows with writing done by amateurs just looking for a break and someone surfing the net.

The last time the Guild struck was in 1988 and the internet was not so popular or mainstream them – at least to today’s standards. Back then, there really wasn’t another viable option to get your content fix. Today, with social networking sites, it’s easier and faster than ever to get all the content you want just by pushing a button (and no I don’t mean the ones on your tv remote).

Not that I am belittling why the Guild is striking, but I don’t think any professional union is ever going to be happy with what is being paid for internet royalties. The more you up the price for writers or actors, the more networks are either going to have to force advertisers to pay, or ask users to pay (more) for content – neither of which is really going to fly. This is a time when the public already feels they pay too much for the goods and services they have. If you ask them to pay more for their internet content too, you’ll have a revolt on your hands – or a larger underground network of file sharing than Napster ever saw.

Speaking of advertisers, will they suffer in all this? Not the smart ones. The smart ones will find ways to use this to their advantage and create engaging online experiences (or so I hope) thus causing a huge up in interactive spending for the year. Not a bad thing for our industry.

What is the solution? I don’t know. Part of me thinks that the union folks need to understand the internet has changed the way the world communicates and the public are the ones running the show now; the days of utter domination and control are over. Then the other part of me says – well, fair is fair and if you’re creating something so great that millions of people all over the world want to watch and download it, then you should get paid properly for that type of success. After all the majortiy of writers don’t make as much as one thinks and most of these guys are indeed underpaid – in my opinion.

Do I hate tv? No, in fact quite the opposite and I will be sad to see some of my favourite shows on hiatus. Do I think this potential strike will be a bad thing? No, again, other than missing some of my favourite shows, I actually think this will be a time for the internet to shine and for marketers to realize the true potential of this space. And hopefully for the writers and studios/networks to find a solution that works for them and the public.

If this strike does happen though, I think this be something we may back on in five years and say “Wow – if it wasn’t for that Writer’s Strike, X wouldn’t exist online?”

Is Email Marketing Dead?

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

Contrary to what you might believe from reading the title – this is not a post about how email itself is dying. It’s a post that I think all fellow email marketers and I will continue to post until we are blue in the face.

I recently receive this email from Dominion/AirMiles and was baffled that these types of emails are still being sent. Look below and see if you can spot the issues. Is it any wonder it landed in my spam filter?


Number 1: It’s mainly images. Images are not email friendly. You need to use an even ratio of image to text – otherwise you’re going to get something that no one can read. If you must use a lot of images, try some alt tags so those with images off can actually determine if there’s anything in the image worth looking at.

Number 2. From Lines: Obviously there’s somethng to be said for recipients connecting with your brand – but outside of the client or their marketing agency – would you really open an email that said Freshobsessed.com? Not to mention – websites don’t really send emails – it’s companies or people.

Number 3. Subject Lines: It’s been said time and time again, and I think I’ve even mentioned it in a past blog post – but don’t use exclamation points and other punctuation in your subject lines. Okay – question marks are debatable, but exclamation marks are definitely a no-no.

On the plus side they did ensure to include opt out instructions as well as why I was receiving the email.

They also did ask me to add the sending address to my safe list to ensure I would keep receiving these offers – but if I didn’t think to check my spam folder in the first place – I’d never have the opportunity to add them to my safe list.

I don’t mean to pick on one marketer – this is just one of many bad emails I get on a daily basis. It just amazes me that no one appears to be listening to all of us marketers who keep providing these tips and tricks. Though I suppose if they did – we’d all be out of jobs.

Online Marketing Blog – Blocked from Digg

Saturday, October 20th, 2007

update below

Read this great post in one of my regular blogs that talks about Google Webmaster Tools and really walks a user through the various elements offered and how they will help you improve (hopefully) your site rankings, and just generally better understand what’s happening at your site.

I went about my merry way of telling the usuals that I like this post. Made it through Stumble Upon and del.icio.us, but when I got to Digg I got the following message:

URL blocked This URL has been widely reported by users as being regularly used to spam Digg’s submission process and cannot be submitted at this time.

I tried a couple of more times just to make sure I hadn’t goofed – but sure enough – that’s what it kept telling me. I have to admit I’m slightly baffled that an online marketing blog which has been named to numerous “Top Blog” honours and currently ranked as 223 by Technorati has been blocked from one of the most popular social networking/bookmarking sites.

Whose big mistake was this? Is this blog just too popular for them? Or have the owners of the blog been shamelessly self promoting themselves a little much?

In all fairness to TopRank, I did contact them and have yet to hear back as I wanted to know what their response was before I posted. They seem to be aware of it, as the digg icons are not on their sites. I’ll post an update once I hear back.

UPDATE
CEO of TopRank Lee Odden replied back to me with the following message:
It’s a confusing issue for us too. Digg started showing that message a
year ago and when we emailed them about it, they said the same thing:
That the URL was reported by users as spam. No other information was
offered and no responses to follow up emails were given either.

At first I thought it was SEO bashing Digg users because several stories
hit the Digg home page about a year ago within a few days of each
other. But now I think it’s likely competitors that are “power” Digg users.

Clearly we’re not a spammy site nor are we using our site to spam Digg
(or any other site). However, the powers that be have no interest in
being transparent about the issue.

It’s such a shame to hear that an online social bookmark site doesn’t understand the industry and what would be considered spam or not. For a company to have tried to rectify the situation and gotten nowhere – that also says a lot for a site in this day and age to not understand the power of the customer experience or word of mouth.

I can see it happening once – maybe twice, as granted, it is a hard thing to police, but once the company contacted Digg to prove they were legitimate, they really should have given them another chance and / or offered a warning. To have a one-strike rule in this industry doesn’t make any sense.

I wonder how many other legit companies / sites are out there with the same problem?

Mexican YouTube

Thursday, October 18th, 2007

This week, YouTube announced it was launching a version of it’s service in Mexico.

The idea behind it is to showcase Mexican talent/content to Mexican users without them having to search for it. And of course, the site is in Spanish.

I’m a little on the fence with this one. On one hand, I find it commendable that YouTube finally realized that there are other users out there who don’t have English as their first language – which allow more people to use their tool.

On the other hand, the whole notion behind social media is sharing content across and without borders/boundaries. Having a separate version of the application seems to defeat this.

Now – in their defence, YouTube officials are saying anything posted on the Mexican version of the site will be available on the traditional YouTube.com and this will help promote Mexican talent in their country.

As they launch other language versions (which I hope and think they should do) I wonder why they simply couldn’t have kept one user interface that allows you to choose your language upon sign in and/or defaults to the language of choice in your country since their owners Google ensure you go to your country extension of their site?

Easy Online Wedding Planner Tool

Wednesday, October 17th, 2007

I nearly fell off my chair today. I discovered something that I never thought possible – it is possible to plan almost your entire wedding online – INCLUDING sending invitations of sorts. To my fiance, Mark – I apologize!

We went to the bridal show a few weeks ago to kick start the plans and of course I am now getting all of the wonderful emails in my inbox for everything we signed up for. The good news is, so far, I haven’t got anything I haven’t asked for.

One of the emails I happened to get was one to confirm my entry in a contest for Wedding Bells with of course the opportunity to update my profile and my website.

My website? I don’t remember the last time I clicked through on an email so fast (good work Wedding Bells). Sure enough, they have managed to set up 4 or 5 (albeit a little cheesy) templates that you can use to very easily create your own wedding website. Talk about user friendly – it spelled everything out so much so that I think I was done in about 2.5 minutes flat. Even the world’s biggest ludite couldn’t get this one wrong.

Fully intrigued at this point, I kept perusing the site and found multiple different tools that I could use to assist me with planning my wedding, including the famous checklists designed to send even the most organized bride (which surprisingly – I’m not) into a panicked frenzy.

I then stumbled across the mother of all surprises. A link in the navigation menu called “My Guest list” Sure enough, you can add each member of your guest list to the site and keep track of who’s attending online… You can also email your wedding website (which includes ceremony and registry details among other things) as well as reminder emails closer to the date with lodging information.

Author’s note: Apologies to anyone who received that email. I was testing out the application and wanted to see what would happen. Unfortunately there’s no warning that the email actually is about to get sent. I clicked on individual’s names and email website link and instead of taking me to a page where I could enter a personal message, I received a thank you page telling me the message had been sent – yet I still don’t know what the message was. Can someone who got one of those messages and is reading this post – forward me a copy? Thanks!

Okay so other than the slight gaf in user experience on the emailing portion of the website to your guests – I’d say this is a pretty good planning tool and very easy to use.

The only other small complaint? I’m not sure if the groom and I will be motivated enough to write out our guest list more than once and manage it in two places – as even I can’t imagine only having an online record of your guest list. There should be an option to download and save/print versions of this list for your records.

Not bad all and all. Wedding Bells – I give you a A for effort and a B- on the user experience. If you can just fix those two complaints I had – all we’d have left to discuss would be upgrading the design templates.

The Facebook Sponsored Group Experience

Tuesday, October 16th, 2007

I recently worked on a sponsored group for a client of mine with Facebook and learned a lot in the process. If you’re thinking about doing one of these groups – here’s a few things to note.

1. This is not just an advertising campaign or tactic. Treat it like you’ve just walked into a room full of the most influential people you’re ever going to meet. How would you talk to them about your brand? Think what you would want to say to them. Now start those conversations in the group.

2. Contests and widgets work well. Don’t try to openly sell anything – or you will get burned. Remember people are on Facebook to hang out with friends and have fun. They are not on Facebook to go shopping.

3. Determine your objective and then determine if a Facebook group makes sense. Is your objective consideration and preference? Then yes – FB probably makes sense – unless you aren’t part of the conversation.

4. Create and facilitate conversation – good and bad that talks about your brand and the user experience with your brand and just allows individuals to talk openly. Think of it like the blog press you can’t do much about.

5. Take advantage of the free poll widget that allows you to ask questions of your group members – use this to gain valuable market research data that you would otherwise have to pay a lot of money for (sorry market researchers).

6. Remember the user’s time is valuable – so if you have nothing to give them – why should they join your group?

7. Work with your PR company – or outsource the management of the group to someone who is experienced with social media/PR – they can help you determine when and how to respond and help you faciliate those not so easy conversations that could otherwise have you on the front page of the news as the next laughingstock of Facebook.

8. Facebook requires a lot of time. It’s really not as simple as put up a group and leave it alone for the three-month duration of your campaign. You must be able to read/review all posts and keep up with the conversation. Depending on the size of the group, the conversations and the various value adds you include – you will need to ensure at least 5-10 hours per week is set aside to manage this. Another potential reason to outsource this.

9. Facebook is very protective of their groups and content – so note that unless it’s a post you’re writing – the content needs to be reviewed by your account manager and approved first. This can take up to five days – so if you’re planning on doing something time sensitive, keep that in mind.

10. Facebook is a long-term strategy. It should not just be considered as part of a specific campaign and the objectives shouldn’t change from campaign to campaign or you will confuse your audience.

Long story short – don’t get on the Facebook train until you’ve determined where this social media utility fits within your overall interactive and social media strategy or you will wind up with egg on your Face(book).

What Does Integration Truly Mean?

Monday, October 15th, 2007

Integration seems to be the word of the day when it comes to marketing these days. Every brief I’ve seen lately refers to the “creation of a targeted and integrated online campaign”

But what does that truly mean? I thought I would start by defining the word integrate as cited by Merriam Webster.

Main Entry: in·te·grate*
Pronunciation: \ˈin-tə-ˌgrāt\
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): in·te·grat·ed; in·te·grat·ing
Etymology: Latin integratus, past participle of integrare, from integr-, integer
Date: circa 1586
transitive verb
1: to form, coordinate, or blend into a functioning or unified whole : unite
2: to find the integral of (as a function or equation)
3 a: to unite with something else b: to incorporate into a larger unit
4 a: to end the segregation of and bring into equal membership in society or an organization b: desegregate
intransitive verb
: to become

As you can see, integration involves unifying or bringing to together many elements into one larger picture. In theory this ties in very well with a general marketing campaign – obviously each element/tactic should reference/work with one another to achieve a more unified user experience.

But what does integration truly mean to the online space?

Does it mean taking your print ad and putting it online? No!

Integration needs to start from the ground up – at the very beginning of the project/campaign brief. The main idea or core theme of your campaign should lend itself to choosing tactics or campaign elements. Force fitting tactics around the theme is not a true integrated experience. (i.e. well we should do online or newspaper ads because that is part of the media buy)

Integration is figuring out how to tell the story you are trying to tell in many different forms, to maximize the reach of your target audience.

When looking at integrating a campaign, the most important piece of the puzzle is to figure out how each of the mediums you are looking at are consumed by your target audience, not just general consumers. You want to use the assets and stengths that each medium has to offer and then determine a strategy for tying them together based on your overarching campaign theme. If your target audience is online, then yes it should be included, but determining how they consume/use the medium is most important in determining which specific tactics can help meet a specific campaign objective.

If your campaign includes tv, OOH and online, you need to determine the objective of each medium and what it is you want people to know about your brand after interacting with each tactic – don’t worry if it’s different for each element – that’s okay – it should be. You and I don’t react to tv ads the same way we would banner ads on a website.

Here’s a theorectical example of how this should work.

Company X wants to create a campaignt that let’s people to know about their great new product and to help spread the word, they thought they would come up with a contest to give away some of this product. Target audience? 18-35 male and females

Now that they have a campaign idea, company X sits down to determine how best to go about this.

First off – they want to have a contest, they determine the best way to do this and to create a website that will host the contest and collect information on potential consumers. The objective? Begin a relationship with each person that enters the contest and ask for permission to continue the relationship by sending them enewsletters, coupons and so on to thank them for their entry. This would allow them the ability to create a database of interested consumers who have given permission and asked to hear more about their products.

They then looked back to their main campaign theme/objective and determined they still hadn’t completely met the objective of telling people about their product up front and creating awareness. They looked to see what their target audience was doing and realized that the main target consisted of users in Toronto and major urban cities and that many of these people either commuted to and from work in cars or on pblic transit. Knowing that iPods and digital devices were used more frequently than radio – they looked at doing an out of home campaign targeting users with billboards, wall murals and subway/transit domination in areas of Canada’s major cities that their target audience spent a lot of time passing. The objective of these ads were to show off the product and create awareness. They decided while to include a url, not to mention the contest given the contest served a different objective or purpose. In an effort to ensure people connected the two, they used the same tagline and same colour scheme for all of their campaign elements. The url drove people to the home page of their website, which had a house ad promoting the contest on the main page.

Now how to drive traffic for the contest itself in order to create that database? They decide some pay-per-click online advertising is the best approach. Some search engine ads and keyword lists – that spoke to the phrases used in the out of home campaign and general product category terms users were actually searching on to find similar products were created. Plus they added some basic demand gen web display advertising that simply focuses on driving people to their contest site. Nowhere in the ads did they talk about the product benefits – since that wasn’t the objective of that tactic. They chose not to advertise with large portals as they only wanted to pay for those people who clicked through to their site – achieving a large number of eyeballs wasn’t important to them in this campaign – not when the objective was to create a database.

As you can see, my ficticious company X took what some would call a different approach to their campaign.

Not every piece would look the same or carry the same message – but when put side by side, you can see how each piece could work together and fit together like a puzzle to create one overarching integrated campaign with tactics that that do more than just look nice together or like one another.

*Source: 2002 Merriam-Webster, Inc.

The Interactive Landscape is Changing

Friday, October 12th, 2007

I think there are some big changes coming to the world of interactive and I’m not sure they are for the better.

A landing page is not as simple some copy, links and a couple of graphics and then you’re done. Understanding what the user experience is going to be when they get to that page and ensuring it’s a positive one to reinforce your brand is one of the most important things in the online world. Throw in some SEO so people can actually find the page and you start adding a whole other layer of tactics that many of us have spent years trying to perfect.

Then there’s the QA side of things. QA of a website is not just reading the copy for spelling errors. (I think QA can be a whole separate post – so I’ll stop there for now).

Recently, in an effort to be more “integrated,” I’ve watched traditional marketers flock to the digital space, thinking it is a piece of cake, and that they can follow the same steps/process as they would for an offline tactic; feeling there’s really nothing to learn other than a few “buzz words.” Frankly, that scares me.

If it were truly as easy as that, there wouldn’t be a need for niche little interactive shops or consultants.

Traditional agencies and other marketing companies are starting to realize that they need to change to keep up with the times. Knowing that many of their client’s print/mass budgets are slowly drying up and interactive budgets are in most cases doubling YOY, there’s a trend taking place that sees the most seasoned “offline” marketers suddenly leading large digital campaigns.

I don’t mean any disrespect, but I know I wouldn’t go around telling anyone how to make a newspaper ad or radio campaign – that’s not my speciality.

Throwing the mass/print teams into the interactive pot with no training or real understanding of the space is not a model for success.

We’re now starting to see a two-tier interactive landscape popping up. You’ve got brands with websites and banner ad campaigns that look like brochures and print ads and don’t take into account how people actually use the web, or view an ad online. These brands are not going to understand why their online marketing don’t seem to be working “because it’s prettier than my competitor’s fill in the blank…”

Which is exactly it. Pretty may be the print way, but isn’t web friendly. Not to say you can’t have a nice looking web site, but the web is all about user experience, how customers interact with and find your brand online and of course functionality. Sometimes pretty has to get sacrificed in order to achieve that.

The brands out there who understand that, will go searching for the right people to create their online user experience and they will rise to the top of the space – even if their product offering leaves something to be desired.

At the end of the day, if you truly want to make interactive work for your brand or your clients, you’re going to have to bite the bullet and get someone in a senior position who comes from the space – someone who was in the trenches and who not only understands all about user experience, SEO and so on, but someone who actually can show you the battle scars they earned from physically doing these things and what they learned in the process.