Time to Get Munked…

Friday, December 14th, 2007

Anyone who has seen my recent Facebook status knows that I am probably a little more excited than an adult woman should be over the fact that Alvin and The Chipmunks movie is in theatres today. If you’ve seen the trailer, then you know what I mean.

After seeing the trailers/commericals, I noticed a phrase – Get Munk’d. Seeing that – it gave me an idea, and I thought wouldn’t it be brilliant if getmunked.com was an actual site for the movie? How brilliant would that be? So I checked… And it is. It’s a pretty funny little microsite that I won’t give away and suggest you check out for yourself.

The main site does link to this microsite as well. The good news is that both sites are great for the entire family. There’s a lot of somewhat cheesy games and activity sheets – but the kids will love them. Also, there’s tons of multimedia stuff – you can view the trailers, tv commercials, download ringtones and so on.

There’s no real point to the site – other than to promote the movie and that is okay. It’s a good way to spend 10 minutes of your day and not mind in the slightest (and perhaps your kids will be there longer if they get hooked on the games). I highly recommend at least checking out the Get Munked site though, as it is really well done.

My only problem with all of this? The url for the main movie site is promoted in the trailers… but nowhere in the tv commercials is the site, or even the Get Munked site promoted anywhere – which is such a miss in my opinion. The microsite is so fun and has so much potential to be viral (outside of the main site) that it should be much more heavily promoted. Given I only saw the commercial promoting the movie yesterday and it comes out today, it seems to me like there could have been a lot more room for pre-marketing efforts. Perhaps there was and I live under a rock, I don’t know. Either way – check out the trailers and the sites – they’re just plain old fun.

Dewmocracy a Don’t

Thursday, December 13th, 2007

When I see a tv commercial solely promoting me to go online for some interactive experience, I almost always check it out because I am always looking for great interactive campaigns. Moutain Dew has a new commercial out pushing folks to Dewmocracy.com.

The commercial is pretty intensive, action-oriented and looks like it cost a bundle to film. Anyone spending that kind of money to push people online gets my interest. The idea behind the campaign is to help create the next Mountain Dew including the flavor, color, name, logo, label, and tagline. Sounds pretty cool.

Unfortunately even though they’ve likely spent more money creating the website than the tv commercial (which says a lot), they really fall short on a few things.

The user experience is lousy right down to have white type in yellow fields as you try to register. Have you tried reading white on yellow? Yup – you can’t see it to know if you actually typed anything correctly. I then had several other bizzare user experiences. When I selected my country as Canada, it automatically refreshed and provided me an error message that I had not identified my province. Of course not – hadn’t got there yet! Province came after country on this form. Once I finished registering (leaving the pre-checked box to receive some updates on the contest) the thank you page confirmed for me that I had confirmed no email subscriptions (pardon?). I went back to check and yup, the box was still ticked, so who knows if I am signed up or not. I then got an additional “information profiling” page which asked me to provide an alternate email address. Hey wait a minute – I already gave you one, why do I need to give you two? Apparently, they say it’s in case the first email address I gave them was incorrect in any way they could make sure I still get the newsletters I subscribed to (wait, I thought they just said I hadn’t subscribed to any?)

Registration finally complete, I log in and get to view the longer version of the movie which is pretty cool from an action standpoint I must admit, until you hit the cheesy ending where the token native guy tells you, “You are the chosen one” and finishes with you replicating a Nestea commercial ending in my opinion.

On to the game itself. Well let’s just say I didn’t get very far and gave up. Now when I say didn’t get very far, well I was on the site for a good 40 minutes with my frustration growing each minute. And I was still only in the first chamber of 7!

Here’s the objective and overview right from the site itself:
Your journey will take you through seven Chambers, where you will meet mythical characters, answer questions, and play games.
Upon entering each Chamber, you will be tasked to create a specific feature of the next Mountain Dew. For example, in the first Chamber, you will select your Drink’s flavor.
Creating the individual features of your Drink will be the first task of each Chamber. Once completed, you can wait for the next Chamber to open or can continue exploring the world of DEWmocracy by playing a series of games.
Your decisions in the first three Chambers will lead you to join 1 of the 3 Teams that will ultimately create the next Mountain Dew. After the 3 most popular combinations of features are determined, you’ll be aligned with the Team whose drink most closely matches your own.
Once aligned with a Team, you will be responsible for creating the logo, label, and ultimately the tag-line of the next Mountain Dew. Each Team will vote on which Drink candidate from those submitted by all Team members will be put forth for a national vote.
Points earned in the game get you higher visibility for your drink, increasing its chances of being selected as your Team’s candidate. Accruing the most points does not directly result in your drink being one of the 3 final selections.
In the final Chamber, your team will vote to determine the Drink candidate that you collectively would like to bring into the real world.

I never got out of the first chamber, several (pointless) games and a lousy navigation experience frustrrated me beyond no end. If I finished a game and was trying to complete another task, but accidently clicked on the game again, when I chose to go back or end the game (since I’d already played it), I lost all the points I’d accumulated playing the game in the first place. How was that fair?

Overall, I think the premise is interesting, the graphics are amazing and this must have been one hell of a thing to program – credit where credit is due.

However, there definitely wasn’t enough thought put into user experience, connection of the games to the storyline or QA. Yes you can log in and go back and play the game more later, making this somewhat like an RPG game, which again is kind of cool for those into such games. The problem is it seems like it is going to be something you would have to play for hours on end to actually finish entering the contest and help make the next Mountain Dew.

Maybe that was the objective, find a way to limit the number of entries. If so, they’ve done it in spades. If the objective was to create a fun, creative, engaging and interactive way to enter the contest, they somewat missed the mark. While the idea is creative and definitely interactive to the max… The fun (at least for me) goes out the window with each user experience gaf that occurs and honestly the length of time it took to get pretty much nowhere with fairly pointless games.

I do have to mention one other cool thing though – the loading graphic is in the shape of a Mountain Dew bottle. I thought that was clever.

Final thoughts – it is obvious that the folks at Pepsi spent a lot of money on this and are serious about interactive for all of their brands. Unfortunately it’s a bit too much flair and not enough focus on the things that make people feel they’ve had the best interactive experience with your brand.

Toronto’s Recreational Program Registration – User Experience Nightmare

Tuesday, December 11th, 2007

My sister recently asked me if I could her register my nephew for his next swimming classes with the City of Toronto. Registration occurs between 7 and 8 a.m. and needs to be done over the phone, or online.

As she works at a hotel and that is a pretty busy time in the morning it’s nearly impossible for her to take care of that. My brother-in-law is usually in transit to the daycare at that time so it’s not like he can take care of that either.

She warned me it was going to be difficult – advising the phone line would be very busy and it would be hard to get through and that I might have to have my redial fingers well oiled. Given my occupation, I asked why we didn’t just do it online. She indicated that the last time they did it online, he didn’t actually get the class they wanted (some sort of system glitch) and all you can do is register, it doesn’t actually confirm if the class still has space – even if it accepts his information.

So the good aunt that I am, I began promptly calling at 6:55 thinking I’d beat the rush. Well apparently me and every other parent in the city. By 7:50 when I still hadn’t got through, I began panicking – what if I didn’t get through – my poor nephew – what would he do???? I decided to try the online system just to see what I could find out and maybe use that as a last resort.

Well too bad the website was down. The City’s website had actually crashed and wouldn’t load – I assume from too many people trying to register. I was shocked. Thankfully they must have kept registration going, because at 8:15 I finally got through and after being on hold for another 15 minutes finally got him registered.

The whole thing just made me think of what a joke the system is and wonder where our tax dollars – including the ones that are paid towards these programs – are going.
I might be dating myself if I say I remember when programs such as swimming lessons used to be free… Now it’s about $50 for somewhere between 5 and 10 classes (still not bad, but if you ask people to pay for something, perhaps you should offer better service…)

How does the city expect working parents to call and register at 7 a.m. in the morning when there aren’t enough phone lines to keep them on hold, let alone the fact that it is not even an automated process. Then there’s the website. How could the City of Toronto not have enough of an infrastructure in place to handle the number of people coming to the site. As my nephew is 6, and my sister has been going through this process for years, you would think they would have learned by now.

I don’t understand what the point is of trying to offer an online service if you can’t actually offer it when people try to use it. The whole process just seems completely ridiculous and unconvenient to me, but then again it is the City of Toronto, what else should we expect?

Email Image Etiquette

Monday, December 3rd, 2007

There is nothing that drives me more crazy then not being able to read email – especially from companies or people I would like to.

As someone with multiple emails, various newsletter subscriptions go to different email accounts depending on which email I used most frequently at the time of signing up. All of my Marketing Mag emails go to my Hotmail account for example.

With Hotmail’s new (updated nearly a year ago) email platform, viewing images in email is difficult – especially if you have previously added the sender to your safe sender list before they rolled out the new platform.

Last week, I received their email about the 2008 Call for Entries. Not only did it break the subject line rule of adding certain punctutation in it (it had not one, but two exclamation points!), but I actually couldn’t and still can’t read it because it is simply one giant image.

Because I added Marketing Mag to my safe sender’s list years ago, I can’t add them again and there is no little button that allows me to “view or download image” in this email. Currently, Hotmail has it set up that once you add new emails to your safe sender’s list, they will then download images automatically for you.

I have tried everthing from forwarding the email to another account (but since the original image was blocked, it doesn’t come through)to switching back to “Classic.” No luck.

The only line in the whole email I can read is the line for how to remove myself, which I guess I am going to have to do and then sign up again just so I can read their emails.

If they had simply added a second line of text that said “Having trouble viewing? Click here” and it took me to a hosted version of the email, no problem. Unfortunately they don’t have that and I have wasted more than enough of my time trying to read this message. In fact to read it, I need to view source, find the image/html code so I can copy and paste it in my broswer and then voila. Really, how many people are going to know that and/or take the time to do that????

Two key take aways here.
1. Don’t make your emails one large image – chances are you going to piss a lot of people off who aren’t going to be able to read your message.
2. If you insist on breaking email etiquette like that, please add a text link that allows me to click out somewhere to view the darn hosted html version of the message

The only reason their subject line made it through to my inbox was because of the fact that I had added them to my safe sender list moons ago. However what good is it that the email made it through if I can’t even read it.

I am disappointed in the fact that the Marketing Magazine in Canada doesn’t understand email marketing best practices.

I am also disappointed in Hotmail for not giving people the option to view images if they so choose. And if there is an option – will someone please point it out to me because I’ve checked all the obvious places and it doesn’t seem to exist.