Why Campaign Visitors Need Their Own Path

Tuesday, December 16th, 2008

When a prospect lands on your website from an advertising campaign, do you send them on the same path as any other visitor to your website? If you do, you need to think again.

Visitors to your site (especially) from online advertising programs have different mindsets than visitors who come to your site because they are regulars, or took the time to search for something they were interested in which brought them to your website.

Here’s what you need to know about (online ad) campaign visitors.

They were in the middle of doing something else first. It was great you caught their attention with your ad and they landed on your site, but remember this: They didn’t start out looking for your ad.

Your ad was a distraction from the original task they wanted to complete.

They want to go back to whatever it was they were doing previously, as fast as possible.

You need to understand and accept that.

You do this by making it as easy and painless as possible for them to complete the task you want them to do.

If you were to compare stats between someone who came to your site from an online ad campaign vs. someone who didn’t, chances are you would quickly come to see the following:

Campaign visitors are unlikely to go more than 1-2 pages deep on your site, whereas non-campaign visitors are more likely to explore your site and its pages.

Keep this in mind, you need to determine the single-most important action you want an ad campaign visitor to take and focus on helping that user complete that task. Giving them too many options complicates the process and makes it easy for them to bail before getting past step two, so they can get back to what they were doing before.

Anything you can do to speed up the process of completing the step you want them to take (say subscribe to your newsletter) and help them get back to their previous task, will be well received. Chances are they will come back to explore later when you’re not just a distraction.

Photo Credit: CanadaKick; Stock.xchng

Twitter Tips Are Like Cottage Cheese

Friday, December 12th, 2008

I’m very excited to announce the first guest post on The Direct Approach – especially when it’s none other than non-profit social media guru John Haydon. John’s a long-time Social Media Consultant and the publisher of CorporateDollar.Org

Twitter tips are like cottage cheese – they should always come with an expiration date.

The viral nature Twitter makes any attempt to differentiate your organization – whether you are a non-profit or a fortune 500 company – with the latest tip obsolete in a matter of days.

So, instead of seeking to differentiate your organization with tactics, go back to your strategy. Understanding the difference between tactics and strategies can unlock a wealth of ideas about using social media.

Here are five ideas from my recent discussions:

1. Use Jott.com, a voice-test translation service to post tweets with your cell phone. It will allow you to stay in the conversation while you pick up your kids from school.
2. Buy a cheap graphic design tool and make your avatar “pop”. I use photoshop elements because it’s easy to use and only cost me $49.
3. Include an “interesting fact” on your background – not one about your non-profit, but about you. The folks you converse with will want proof that you’re human. Don’t be scared.
4. If you choose to use an autoresponder (using tweetlater.com), make it human, useful and about the person following you.
5. Create a second Twitter account, to use as a broadcaster about your non-profit.

The take away?

Make up your own Twitter Tips – remember, success depends on who leads, not who follows :-)

Web Analytics – A Few Key Definitions

Wednesday, December 10th, 2008

I spend a lot of my day focused on data and analytics, and trying to determine the “why” behind actions taken in an online environment. I often forget that not everyone spends their time the same way I do, so I thought I’d take a moment to define a few key analytics measurements and describe when/how they are used or calculated. 

Bounce or Exit Rate: The percentage of people leave who your website from a particular page. They may or may not have completed any actions (or visited other web pages. Bounce rate is sometimes interchanged with Single Access Rate).
Single Access Rate: The percentage of people who visited a particular page and left from that same page and did not complete any actions. This is most useful when looking at campaign landing pages or your home page.
 
Click Through Rate: Usually used with ad campaigns, a statistic that helps identify the number of people who clicked on a particular link, divided by the number of people who saw it. For ads, it’s usually clicks on the ad or link, divided by the number of impressions (or eyeballs). It can also be used on a page to determine the number of people who clicked on links on a particular page divided by the number of total page views of that page. Can be confused or often interchanged with conversion rate.
 
Conversion Rate: The number of people who completed a desired action based on the total potential audience that could take such an action. For example, if you had 100 people come to your homepage where you really wanted them to register for your newsletter, and 10 people did, your conversion rate would be 10 per cent. This metric often gets confused with click through rate or can be interchanged. In my honest opinion, a conversion rate has to do with actions, or task completion, not just clicking on a link on your campaign landing page. However, if you don’t have a newsletter, or perhaps your product is not one people can buy online, this is where many people may use clicks on a specific link also as their conversion rate.
What you might consider in that case is a specific path or journey that you want visitors to take. Ideally, you want them to visit more than one page on your site. Using a path analysis report, you can input the pages that you want people to visit and you will be able to know how many people took that specific journey. To get your conversion rate in this instance, you take the total number of people who took that journey and divide it by the number of people who viewed the page where your journey would start.
Are there any specific metrics that you’re not too sure how they are collected, what they showcase or when best to use them? Let me know and I’ll be happy to explain them as best I can.
Photo Credit: scataudo; sxc.hu 

It’s Not Your Brand They Hate – It’s Your Actions

Monday, December 1st, 2008

A good friend and I got into a conversation a while back about actions and people. It’s not people we like or dislike, it’s their actions. It really got me thinking how that can be extended across to brands and products too. If consumers say they don’t like you – it’s often not your product or brand (unless you really do have a lousy product), but the actions taken on behalf of that product or brand by marketing and advertising campaigns, or people associated with the company.

Let’s look at this whole Motrin kerfuffle as a shining example. Motrin is the same product it always was, however, now there are swarms of mothers out there who say they will not use the product again. It has nothing to do with how good or bad the product is; it has to do with a choice that was made to run a specific advertising campaign. Because of this action, it has changed the perception people have of the brand and their feelings towards it.

If you think of the traditional marketing/advertising brief, there’s usually some sort of question around, “What do we want the consumer to think/believe after seeing our ad/product?”

And then there are questions around brand perception, asking what people currently tend to think of the brand or product.

If the folks at Motrin were to fill this out now vs. before the campaign, the answers to those questions would look a whole lot different, and if I lived under a rock, I wouldn’t know why a good many people have the perception of the brand it now seems they do.

Wouldn’t it be interesting to understand why people think the way they do? What “action” took place to put those thoughts in someone’s head?

What would happen if you broke down the actions that your company has taken over the last two to five years and started writing down the perceptions of your brand, company or product that people had before and after each action? Yes, I know there are focus groups and brand perception studies that do this now – but do they go to the next level?

What if you began tracking the perceptions against more than ad campaigns – anything you’ve done (donations, social media presence, etc.) – and began looking for patterns to understand what kinds of actions generally changed consumer’s perceptions – whether it be for good or bad… or indifferent.

You could suddenly start making a case for doing – or not doing – any number of things because of how your consumers *should* react (Note: no such thing as a sure thing).

It’s not just about asking why, it’s about understanding how and why your actions affect others.

Photo Credit: Ralph Atkinson