What Vanity URLs Can Tell You

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

If you’re a not-for-profit using canvassing techniques – whether it is traditional door-to-door tactics, presence at a community event, or some other form of human connection – it can be difficult to track your success if you don’t capture donations on the spot.

How do you know if the pitch you gave sunk in and if the person who said they were going to think about it, really did decide to follow through and donate? One of the easiest and most cost effective things you can do would be to create a vanity url to help you track the success of these face-to-face campaign efforts.

A vanity url can be either a memorable web address redirecting to a specific page on your company’s website, or an extension of the current domain (e.g 123.com/xyz).

You might already create vanity urls for your DRTV or direct mail pieces, but have you thought of taking them that one step further? What about creating vanity urls for your canvassers to use that are separated by region, province, city or even events?

If you could track which teams, areas or events ended up providing web traffic, you could begin to increase your response rates and cost per donor acquisition for these tactics.

By simply creating either a ‘calling’ card for each url (team) or by inserting the urls as part of the dynamic copy changes (i.e showing regional office contact information) for your brochures and leaflets, you might suddenly begin to know whether or not your public outreach campaigns are generating awareness, and better yet, donations. Many times canvassers simply leave information behind, or speak to someone who is busy, or in today’s society, simply untrusting. A vanity url provides you an opportunity to know which potential donors decided to check out your website on their own time and terms.

By having multiple vanity urls, you would be able to review your analytics data to not only see how many people visited your site by specific group (url), but what they did while there and how that behaviour compares to other website visitors (eg donors vs. online ads vs search engine visitors etc). Is there a specific page people from the vanity urls looked at? How does that compare across the urls? You could provide this information to your canvassers so they know what topics or types of information they might need to cover in certain areas – perhaps it’s different region by region. Is there one url that provides you with a high conversion rate? If so, this data then becomes a great way for you to connect with your teams on the ground and provide them positive feedback, or have them mentor those teams that seem to have lower conversion (close) rates.

Of course vanity urls are only good if people use them and this tends to be a highly controversial topic since recent studies show that more people may recall a vanity 800-number easier than a vanity url (if listening to or watching an ad). But considering how cost effective they are (especially if you use an extension of your site), why not take a chance? You may or may not get oodles of data, but you’ll definitely get more than you have now, and enough to get a better understanding of what’s happening after your canvassers have gone away.

Don’t upset a blogger

Monday, March 5th, 2007

So the Sandals Resorts saga continues.

When I posted the last bloig note, I had submitted a comment on their site about the marketing error they made promoting a US contest in a Canadian pub (Read post).

After an automated reply indicating someone would respond, I received a prompt reply back the next business day apologizing for any misunderstanding. Okay, good, that’s a start and much appreciated – I’ll even overlook the text email coded in html, they apparently wanted me to log on and view the response in pretty html, rather than just using my finger to scroll down the email I was reading) – It all went downhill from there.

I was dumbfounded when I then read:“Promotions are extremely dynamic and we try to be as egalitarian as possible, however, not all promotions will always be applicable to all markets.”

What does that tell you?
Either that they chose to have their ads in Canada run this promotion available to US residents only, knowing full well it wasn’t available to Canadians and didn’t care; or that they still don’t get that the only people who will see those ads in this publication are Canadians, so there’s nothing egalitarian about it – unless they choose to run a contest only for Canadians in their US magazines. Wonder what you think would happen there?

I decided to reply to this email, indicating my frustrations and laying my elusive “I’m an online marketer” cards on the table. I let them know my disappointment as both a consumer and a marketer. Apparently they don’t seem to care. I haven’t heard anything back from them in over a week. I waited before posting any updates to this story so that I could be fair and give them a chance to respond before posting another negative comment here. My patience has run dry I’m afraid.

Sandals Resorts – you should be ashamed at yourselves for some of the worst direct-response marketing I’ve seen in ages.

For your reading pleasure, I have copied below their original response as well as my reply, removing of course, the email addresses in the nature of privacy….

—– Forwarded Message —-
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 1:08:35 AM
Subject: Re: Sandals Operator Issue Response,issue_id:206385

Thanks for your reply.

While I can understand not all your promotions are applicable to all markets, I can’t understand why you would knowingly run a promotion in a Canadian publication to promote a US-only based contest. You would think you would either leave the url off the ad entirely, or promote something specific to Canadians.

If I were reading a US publication, I would expect I might not be able to enter the contest. However, as I am reading a Canadian publication, as a consumer, I expect to receive offers that are relevant to me, including contest promotions.

As somone who is actually in the marketing and advertising industry, I find this very misleading and unprofessional and would never advise my clients to market their products and services this way.

Regards,

—– Original Message —-
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:20:28 PM
Subject: Sandals Operator Issue Response,issue_id:206385

The issue you submitted has been answered!
You may view the response history on the ETS Response Center
at the following URL:
http://ets.sandals.com

Please remember that your password is case sensitive.

Copy of Response:
Subject: Thank you for contacting Sandals and Beaches Resorts
Message:
Thank you for contacting Sandals and Beaches Resorts. We appreciate the opportunity to assist you.

We apologize fo rany misunderstanding. We have market specific promotions because not all markets are the same. At times, we offer promotions that are more focused on our non-US visitors. At other times, we have intra market promotions such as our Midwest or West coast – USA promotions.

Promotions are extremely dynamic and we try to be as egalitarian as possible, however, not all promotions will always be applicable to all markets.

Thank you for choosing Sandals and Beaches Resorts.

Best regards,<

Unique Vacations, Inc.
Sandals & Beaches resorts

http://www.SANDALS.com
http://www.BEACHES.com
Toll Free 1-800-SANDALS
Toll Free 1-800-BEACHES

For current promotions offered at our Beaches resorts please visit http://www.beaches.com/general/specials.cfm

For current promotions offered at our Sandals resorts please visit http://www.Sandals.com/general/specials.cfm

This communication contains information from Unique Vacations, Inc. that may be confidential. Except for personal use by the intended recipient, or as expressly authorized by the sender, any person who receives this information is prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, and/or using it. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and all copies, and promptly notify the sender. Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic signature under applicable law.

Think like a consumer

Wednesday, February 7th, 2007

Next time you’re looking at an email campaign, an online ad, or any sort of call-to-action-type direct-marketing “thing,” just ask yourself one question:

“If I weren’t a marketer/client” would I open this email/click on this link etc..?”

If the answer is “No” – and you would consider yourself to be a likely candidate for this product or service, then no offence, you need to ask youself why you think your consumers would be likely to take the “fill in the blank” action you are asking them to do?

If you would find that email subject line “spammy” or boring, why do you think it is so important to use it in your newsletter or e-promo? Who exactly are you trying to target that wouldn’t for even half a second ask themselves if they find your subject line appealing and non-spam like in nature?

Tamera Kremer recently posted a brilliant blog post about her p-SWOT theory which takes my rant to a whole new level of thinking. If you involve your customers and prospects at every stage of the game they’ll be your friends for life.

All too often we get caught up in the coolness of the idea, or the latest and greatest trends and forget that before we were marketers… we were all consumers.. Wait – that hasn’t changed. No matter how you slice it, ultimately, we’re all consumers first and nothing will ever change that.