Do You Know What Colours Work in Your Advertising?

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

Have you ever wondered what colours would look good in your ads? Do you know what the colours behind your logo or brand mean?
About.com has great content explaining what colours mean. Next time you’re sitting in your creative director’s office you can thoughtfully ask them if they used the colour orange to stumulate emotions or to bridge a gap and see how they answer. Good test to see if they know why they did what they did!

Not sure what colour to make that starburst in your ad? Take a moment and check out COLOURLovers

COLOURlovers gives the people who use color – whether for ad campaigns, product design, or in architectural specification – a place to check out a world of color, compare color palettes…

Because ads are about visual stimulation, colour is/can be very important to your audience. You should be testing a variety of colours in your marketing campaigns to determine what colours perform best for you. Do the same colours perform well both in off and online for you? Have you tested it even?

It’s important to understand the role that colour plays in your marketing/advertising efforts and ensure any findings are incorporated in each and every one of your briefs – and how that differs by tactic – if it does.

Photo Credit: November Fresh by Raeanne

The Canadian Tire Saga Continues

Friday, March 14th, 2008

UPDATE March 14/08: A $100 gift card arrived today via registered mail. Am I still disappointed? Yes at the overall experience. Am I going to look a gift horse in the mouth? No. This shall be the last post on this subject. I am appreciative of the gift card, just not as appreciative of the service received to get to this point. I am curious though if everyone received this card, which if so – I must say is a nice show of goodwill. Or perhaps I was one of the loudest complainers. Who knows. If anyone else experienced this, I’d love to get an update – or even a comment/response from someone on the CT team.
***************
March 12/08
I think everyone must be getting sick of this – I know I’m starting to be, but I promised an update and as much as I’d like to say this story has a happy ending, I’ve been unfortunately disappointed yet again.

For those of you following me on Twitter you’ll know that I received an email from a business analyst at Canadian Tire who came across my blog posts and wanted to help. I was pleasantly surprised, it was obvious he cared about my experience with the brand and wanted to try and change it, even though he didn’t have anything to do with the gift registry program.

We exchanged a few emails and he even went so far as personally contacting the gift registry manager to send them the original emails I’d sent along with my blog posts. He told me someone would be getting back in touch with me shortly. I was starting to think that perhaps the world was good again and that there had been some sort of little glitch somewhere that was going to be fixed. Most importantly, I was starting to feel valued as a customer again. Companies need more employees like this guy who contacted me. I applaud him. He’s been the best experience I’ve had with the brand to date.

I then waited, and waited some more. Then late Friday afternoon(more than 24 hours after my initial conversation with the business analyst), I received in my inbox two automated emails that thanked me for each of my original emails and advised that due to a high volume of emails someone would be in touch with me soon. I was then provided a tracking number, a 1800 number and it was signed “Canadian Tire Customer Service Representative.” Underneath that, they had included the special coding for what type of automated message to send me…

2-English – Auto Response Message (From Jan 4th and beyond)

Those who understand email marketing know you should either turn that notification off, bury it by using multiple hard returns, or put it in white text or something so your reader doesn’t see it. Sure deflated my earlier feelings of being a valued customer to know that everyone who sent a note after January 4th got this message.

I then immediately got a third email that was from the Associate Marketing Manager for the gift registry. It again thanked me for my emails, said my comments were forwarded to the team and indicated that it was a difficult decision for them to make, but they felt it was no longer feasible to continue the registry program. It then told me my gift was being mailed and it would arrive by the end of this coming week.

Disappointment set in. No phone call, no explanation as to why it took so long for auto-responder emails to arrive, and nothing that really addressed what I’ve expressed in my posts. And then to make matters worse, the email was signed with a first initial and last name only and that was it. There was no, please call me if you want to discuss or here’s how to reach me. It was cold. It wasn’t warm and friendly or personal. I now realize it too came from a generic email address. Big mistake. You’re telling me the Associate Marketing Manager doesn’t have a real email address and responds to me from a generic registry email? By not including their actual first name, or contact details I have to wonder if it was actually written by someone else instead just pretending to be a more senior person.

I responded to the email (not having realized I was simply sending to another generic email addy) asking questions about why there was a delay in the emails and if there was a glitch in the system or what it might have been so I could explain this to my blog readers and hopefully make good of the situation. I sent this email on Monday. I’ve yet to hear back and there’s no other contact information in the email for me to reach this first initial, last name manager.

Given the fact that the emails came one after another within minutes of each other – I have to wonder what the problem actually was? A broken email deployment system that hadn’t been checked? Or perhaps it’s a manual deployment every time someone responds. If so – it certainly isn’t checked on a regular basis.

At the end of the day, they (Canadian Tire) just don’t get it – it’s not about the gift anymore (though I really wouldn’t be averse to that snowblower). It’s about making me feel like a valued customer. I may be a homeowner and consequently started forming my brand opinions years ago, but there are many others who at this important life-event stage are just forming relationships with brands and companies. Relationships that could last a lifetime. People who are the future of Canadian Tire’s business and to treat us with cold, impersonal emails that don’t actually explain or address our concerns in a timely fashion is just plain wrong.

As a proud Canadian I try to support Canadian companies when I can, however, I like most others, enjoy being treated like a valued customer who matters to a company. In this case, I feel like nothing but a number and outside of this business analyst, don’t feel like the company cares whether I give them my business or not. So if you really feel that way Canadian Tire, I’m happy to shop elsewhere.

How to Improve the Customer Service Experience (or Third Time is not the Charm)

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Rather than make this a rant-and-rave post (which it is, no matter how you slice it), I’m going to try and make this productive for other marketers.

This is an update to the series of Canadian Tire posts regarding the company’s decision to close its version of a gift registry — Celebration Station.

I’ve blogged before that company representatives had indicated I would receive a gift 2-4 weeks after confirming my address with them. It’s now been more than six weeks and there’s been no gift and no further communication. This despite two attempts to contact them via the email address provided for gift registry questions. I even pointed them in the direction of my posts and indicated that I had readers asking for updates.

Quite frankly, I’m appalled at their lack of communication. So if you plan on removing a service you offer your customers, here are a few points to remember:

1. Have a detailed plan in place about how you’re going to go about removing the service and what you’re going to replace it with (if anything), and detail how you plan on addressing it to your customers.

2. Chances are if someone hears you’re going to discontinue something, that is when the product/service will be in full demand. So if you plan on offering a gift or some form of tangible apology offer to your customers, make sure you can fulfill them by adding 40% to your calculation of the number of items you think you need. If you have extra, it can be a great chance to hold a contest for your customers — or even employees for the number of complaints they are likely to have to deal with over this decision.

3. Appoint one person to take point on all communications received (phone calls, emails and monitoring of social networks and blogs etc.) Have a team designed to deal with anything that comes up and prepare a contact strategy that includes a time line for getting back to individuals — and stick to it.

4. Consider changing your telephone on-hold messaging to address concerns customers may have with this change in your offering. Create automated email responses to be sent back to those customers who send you an email. State the time lines you’ve created (and yes, buffer slightly) for getting back to people so they know their email didn’t get lost in some cyberspace vacuum.

5.Care. Care what people are saying and make sure your staff cares too. If neither you nor they do, then you have bigger problems that can’t be addressed by this post.

All in all, if your customers think you care about them and their feelings, chances are they are going to be a little more accepting of issues you might have meeting promises you’ve given them. They may not like it, but I have to say that if I had any communication from Canadian Tire in all of this after the initial “so long, we’re closing” email, this probably wouldn’t be my third blog post about the situation.

Sony Understands the Importance of Relevancy

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008

Just read a great case study on Jeremiah Owyang’s blog on how Sony created a successful Facebook campaign with the Vampire widget.

I’m so happy something like this was profiled. It goes to show what all of us have been saying until we’re blue in the face. If you make it relevant, people will notice and particiapte.

It’s unfortunate that relevancy is still so often overlooked. Just because Facebook, or any other form of social media or any digital channel for that matter is popular at the moment, doesn’t mean your brand should jump on the band wagon.

Take your time and think about your target audience. Understand how you can interact with them in a way that is meaningful and adds value to what they are doing.

As Jeremiah says:

Sony didn’t beat the 3 million existing users with heavy advertising (and I’m sure RockYou wouldn’t have let them) over the head, instead offered value by giving away prizes, and tied in a movie that already existed.

If you can understand your audience, and I mean truly get in their head space, then you’ve won half the battle of marketing your products and/ or services.

Understanding your audience and determining what they would be interested in will open many doors to marketing strategies and tactics that will add value and (hopefully, if implemented properly) will end up providing your consumers with a positive brand experience.

Well done Sony by the way….

The Home Based Business Website

Friday, January 25th, 2008

I have friends who have started selling Avon and Pampered Chef. Each of them have sent me emails letting me know about their websites, which the company has provided some sort of boiler-plated template system allowing for “easy creation” and then it is hosted on their platform.

I find it great that the companies provide tools such as this to their consultants/ sales teams to be able to promote themselves. The problem though is that the way the sites are set up, it generally doesn’t allow for them to be very user friendly, or for that matter search engine friendly.

Sure it’s great to have a website, but what if nobody comes to it? Or once they get there, it’s not easy to navigate through the page? Without knocking the efforts my friends have made to get their sites up and running – since I am still amazed at the number of companies out there who don’t have a website – these sites really aren’t going to win them any awards. They don’t (nor should they) claim to be online marketing experts, since that’s obviously not their business. So why should they know how to build a great website that is optimized for search and would be talked about by their customers because they were so easy to use. That’s a job for the company in my opinion.

As a home-based business, you struggle enough to keep yourself afloat and promote your wares, let alone the countless hours of administration that you need to do, having to further promote yourself and redo a website to make sure people can find you should not be on your list of to dos.

These individuals are spending their time selling a company’s products and as that company, you’ve taken the time to make your website look nice and friendly for search engines as well as usability so shouldn’t you offer the same type of service to those who are in essence kind of like your brand evanglists? (I’m making a big assumption on the above statement, since in reality not everyone actually knows how to do this, or does it, but that’s theory we should, or aim to, practice).

Maybe they aren’t going to have as extensive a site as your company, but why not make it easier for them to get business? People who have these little ventures on the side often have other committments (whether a job or family) and generally don’t have as much time to devote to understanding how to market their (or your) business online. Sure if they become successful, this may become their full-time job and they can then afford to hire marketing help, but until that day it’s always going to be a stuggle and companies need to step up to the plate and provide more support than they are presently doing.

I have two suggestions for companies like this:

1. Hire someone (unless you have experts in house) to write some 101s on how to make the software/ templates/ tools you have provided more search engine friendly and usable (so that once they have people on the site, they can keep them there) and provide that as a tutorial to your consultants available for download before they build their website.

2. Create some tools and education maaterial for simple online marketing tactics(explain paid search, social media/ networking, affiliate marketing and (legal) email marketing) that are designed to drive traffic so that these individuals can set themselves and their website up for success.

In the long run everyone benefits, given the pyramid structure of most of these businesses, the more sales/ income brought in from your sales consultants, the more revenue you as a company make.

Side Note: As I am generalizing a lot here and making some assumptions, if anyone out there does know of one of these types of companies that offers this type of “training” let me know as I’d like to show someone whose got it right.

And to my friends whom I’ve talked about here – you know you’ve got an open offer on my end for advice any time you want it, I’m definitely not knocking your efforts and in fact am quite impressed you took the time to create a website in the first place.

I Twitter a Confession

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

Back in November, I wrote a post about Twitter and was having a very hard time wrapping my head around it’s usefulness.

I must confess, I’ve been spending some time with it and think that I might be turning into a convert. Sure there are a lot of social tools out there, and Facebook allows you to share items and status updates with your friends pretty easily; but what I’ve found is that while Twitter seems to do the same thing, it does it in a different fashion. With only 150 characters (including spaces) to update what you’re doing, it’s a very convenient way of sending quick updates to friends and colleagues on various things you’re doing in your day.

I liken it to the new grapevine for the technological age. I hear about new blog posts people have enjoyed and/ or posted. I also find it’s been helping me prioritize which articles from the numerous industry newsletters I should read first. It’s also been great at keeping me in the loop with other happenings within the industry and across the globe.

In general, I have to say I feel, well, more connected.

I struggled in my previous post understanding how this could be considered a great marketing tool. And I think I finally figured it out. Like anything, Twitter is not a tool that should be used on its own, but if used as part of an overall marketing strategy to the right audience, I actually think it could really work. Now in terms of specific ideas I have – I won’t give that away, afterall, being in the business myself I think I might have to save those gems for my clients. :)

Here’s a few quick tips on how to make the most of your Twitter experience (keeping in mind I’ve only been a Twitterer for a short while).

- Explore the Twitter tools and applications available and incorporate Twitter into your daily life, such as your blog or Facebook.
- Use a different update program. Rather than simply staying logged into Twitter’s website, download one of the many add ons that allow you to update on the fly (like Messenger). I currently use Twitterfox for Mozilla.
- Import your address books to allow you to easily find friends and colleagues who use the service.
- Once you start following people, look to see who they are following (not in a creepy, stalkerish way) to look for those you might want to network with.
- And Lastly, don’t be afraid to update your status often and/ or begin conversations with others – about things that might be relevant to all of you.

Happy Twittering…. Oh and and if you want to, go ahead and Follow Me.

My New Favourite Site

Monday, November 19th, 2007

I may be a marketer – but I too am a consumer – and as a result of both those things I have to give credit to one of the most brillant sites I’ve come across in a long time.

Ihatedoorknocking.com is nothing more than a marketing ploy – but one that couldn’t resonate better with its target market if it tried.

As a homeowner, I often get those knocks on my door asking to see my gas bill to ensure I am getting the “discount” on my utility bill that I should be. Give me a break – share my personal information and account number with some stranger? I don’t think so. This site takes that experience and pokes fun at it in every possible way.

You can print door hangers and watch a few comical videos on how to get rid of door knockers. My favourite is the turning of the tables using the second most annoying door knocking example out there (the third one down).

I don’t remember the last time I laughed so hard at a marketing campaign.

I first heard the commercials on the radio several months ago and confess though I’d always been meaning to go to the site – I didn’t get there until today. However, they were so memorable that not only did the url stick in my mind all this time, I told several people about the commercial and the site without even having visited it. That’s word of mouth marketing if I ever experienced it.

When you get to the site – it’s very obviously sponsored by
RiteRate, an online energy utility company. However, it is not shoved down your throat and nowhere on this microsite can you get a quote. If you’re interested, you can click through to their site and get one. Yet the entire time, they encourage you to “stay a while” on the microsite and “have some fun.” The site has tons of little goodies including “tall tales” told by door knockers, knock-knock jokes, the top-ten list of good door-knockers (including the kiddies who trick or treat and cookie-selling-Girl Guides), and of course the ability to report door knocker sightings in your neighbourhood.

This is a great example of branding as well as subtle marketing that allows the consumer to come to you. They’ve taken the most annoying aspect of selling gas and turned it into a statement about their brand and their respect for customer service. By not including a quoting engine on their microsite they are staying true to their statement that the customer should take all the time they need to make an informed decision. I am not a customer of RiteRate (yet), but one of my other browser windows currently open is their site so I can get more information – because after working so hard to prove they offer more than just a price difference to me, I definitely deserve to ‘hear’ them out and see what they can offer.

The only thing I would do to improve the site – add more interactivity. Allow users to create and upload their own videos of how to get rid door knockers. Also, instead of just posting door knocking alerts, allow people to email these (and share the site) to their friends and neighbours. This has great legs for a wonderful viral campaign, but requires the user to work at creating this, something I ‘knock’ them for.

Kudos to the creators behind this idea and site though – absolutely brilliant.

Flickr’s Mistake in User Experience

Friday, November 9th, 2007

I was setting up an account for a client on Flickr today and had a pretty bad user experience.

My client happened to have a very long email address that would be used for their alternate contact info and Flickr wouldn’t take it. It was cut off before I could finish entering all of the charactrs. While I searched for a way to inform them of this error or find a way to know exactly how many characters they allowed in an email address, it was to no avail. I actually had to ask for a shorter/secondary email address in order to create this account; it was somewhat embarrassing.

Here’s a few simple tips to creating forms with the best possible user experience in mind.

1. Always let the user know how many characters they have when creating usernames, passwords or providing email addresses. Supplying information including any special requirements – either in text below, or in a little question mark pop up to the right of the field will keep user frustration to a minimum.

2. Let the user know how many steps, or how long it will take them to fill out this information. If your form is long, try a percentage complete bar and if it’s short – a simple step x of x, or “This will take less than x minutes to complete” will do.

3. If your form is long, ensure that you actually allow users to save their information and come back at a later time to complete or finish it, as life doesn’t always allow you to do things in one sitting. Nothing is worse then getting halfway or more through the form and having some kind of technical malfuction or other interuption that erases it all (as I also recently experienced while trying to fill out a five-page form on another site).

4. Contact information – when creating contact information fields, think of where your users may be located. If your users will be only from one country, then consider using short fields that are the exact length of the information they have to enter and automatically tab over to each place (For example in Canada postal code could be broken up into two fields of three and once three characters are entered, you could program it to automatically tab over so there’s no error in entering information and the user understands how you would like it collected/entered – spaces or no spaces). If you will likely have many users from multiple countries, than something like that likley doesn’t make sense, unless you spend the time programming your fields to update based on country chosen.

5. Required information and error notices. The most frustrating part of filling out forms for a user usually comes down to one of two things – either not knowing what information is mandatory – or not properly being able to identify what errors occured in an easy to figure out fashion.

Both of these items happened when signing up for my client’s Flickr account. Not knowing my client’s birthday, I didn’t put it in. The instructions on the sign up page simply tell you to answer a few easy questions – and don’t specify that they are all required. When I tried to create the account it didn’t seem to work, I wasn’t directed to a thank you page and I seemed to still be on the same form. I didn’t get an error message (or so I thought). After clicking to create again, I did some investigating and scrolled up to find out that there was a little red exclamation point beside the birthday box indicating that it was required.

Better user experience? After either clearly identifying (with symbols, or better text) what is mandatory for the user to complete. Program the form so that if an error occurs, it will automatically jump to the field in question and identify the mistake and possibly provide solutions to resolve the problem; or have the error message appear at the bottom of the form in a place that is easy to find, rather than making the user work to find out the problem, and again, identifying how to rectify the situation, isn’t such a bad idea.

At the end of the day, the most important piece of advice is this: If your user has to work so hard to sign up for your service, chances are you are going to lose a whole lot of potential clients or leads in the process. In this day and age when time is a commodity, wasting minutes means wasting money and no will waste their own money on a bad experience if they have an alternative.

What Does the Writer’s Guild Strike Mean for Online?

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007

The Writer’s Guild of America voted overwhemingly in favour of striking last week, potentially as early as Nov. 1 – but likely not until the Spring.

What is at the heart of this potential strike? Fees for dvd sales and of course, internet downloads/content.

Let’s put aside the fact that we’ll all be forced to watch nothing but reality tv shows for who knows how long if this happens; and look at what this means for the web – if anything.

If there’s no tv to watch, there’s no downloads – or is there? In this generation of the over-cliched “Content is King,” era let’s look at where most of the content comes from. YOU – the user. User-generated content has been around longer than one might imagine but has grown significantly in popularity over the last few years with the help of sites like YouTube.

Put aside whether or not you like user generated content for a moment – and just think of this. With no good tv to watch, audiences will flock to the web (and/or hopefully outside for extra exercise) to find great content to occupy their time. If there’s no content to download, users will just make their own and the internet will keep on humming. I’m sure we’ll see spoofs popping up of favourite tv shows with writing done by amateurs just looking for a break and someone surfing the net.

The last time the Guild struck was in 1988 and the internet was not so popular or mainstream them – at least to today’s standards. Back then, there really wasn’t another viable option to get your content fix. Today, with social networking sites, it’s easier and faster than ever to get all the content you want just by pushing a button (and no I don’t mean the ones on your tv remote).

Not that I am belittling why the Guild is striking, but I don’t think any professional union is ever going to be happy with what is being paid for internet royalties. The more you up the price for writers or actors, the more networks are either going to have to force advertisers to pay, or ask users to pay (more) for content – neither of which is really going to fly. This is a time when the public already feels they pay too much for the goods and services they have. If you ask them to pay more for their internet content too, you’ll have a revolt on your hands – or a larger underground network of file sharing than Napster ever saw.

Speaking of advertisers, will they suffer in all this? Not the smart ones. The smart ones will find ways to use this to their advantage and create engaging online experiences (or so I hope) thus causing a huge up in interactive spending for the year. Not a bad thing for our industry.

What is the solution? I don’t know. Part of me thinks that the union folks need to understand the internet has changed the way the world communicates and the public are the ones running the show now; the days of utter domination and control are over. Then the other part of me says – well, fair is fair and if you’re creating something so great that millions of people all over the world want to watch and download it, then you should get paid properly for that type of success. After all the majortiy of writers don’t make as much as one thinks and most of these guys are indeed underpaid – in my opinion.

Do I hate tv? No, in fact quite the opposite and I will be sad to see some of my favourite shows on hiatus. Do I think this potential strike will be a bad thing? No, again, other than missing some of my favourite shows, I actually think this will be a time for the internet to shine and for marketers to realize the true potential of this space. And hopefully for the writers and studios/networks to find a solution that works for them and the public.

If this strike does happen though, I think this be something we may back on in five years and say “Wow – if it wasn’t for that Writer’s Strike, X wouldn’t exist online?”

What Does Integration Truly Mean?

Monday, October 15th, 2007

Integration seems to be the word of the day when it comes to marketing these days. Every brief I’ve seen lately refers to the “creation of a targeted and integrated online campaign”

But what does that truly mean? I thought I would start by defining the word integrate as cited by Merriam Webster.

Main Entry: in·te·grate*
Pronunciation: \ˈin-tə-ˌgrāt\
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): in·te·grat·ed; in·te·grat·ing
Etymology: Latin integratus, past participle of integrare, from integr-, integer
Date: circa 1586
transitive verb
1: to form, coordinate, or blend into a functioning or unified whole : unite
2: to find the integral of (as a function or equation)
3 a: to unite with something else b: to incorporate into a larger unit
4 a: to end the segregation of and bring into equal membership in society or an organization b: desegregate
intransitive verb
: to become

As you can see, integration involves unifying or bringing to together many elements into one larger picture. In theory this ties in very well with a general marketing campaign – obviously each element/tactic should reference/work with one another to achieve a more unified user experience.

But what does integration truly mean to the online space?

Does it mean taking your print ad and putting it online? No!

Integration needs to start from the ground up – at the very beginning of the project/campaign brief. The main idea or core theme of your campaign should lend itself to choosing tactics or campaign elements. Force fitting tactics around the theme is not a true integrated experience. (i.e. well we should do online or newspaper ads because that is part of the media buy)

Integration is figuring out how to tell the story you are trying to tell in many different forms, to maximize the reach of your target audience.

When looking at integrating a campaign, the most important piece of the puzzle is to figure out how each of the mediums you are looking at are consumed by your target audience, not just general consumers. You want to use the assets and stengths that each medium has to offer and then determine a strategy for tying them together based on your overarching campaign theme. If your target audience is online, then yes it should be included, but determining how they consume/use the medium is most important in determining which specific tactics can help meet a specific campaign objective.

If your campaign includes tv, OOH and online, you need to determine the objective of each medium and what it is you want people to know about your brand after interacting with each tactic – don’t worry if it’s different for each element – that’s okay – it should be. You and I don’t react to tv ads the same way we would banner ads on a website.

Here’s a theorectical example of how this should work.

Company X wants to create a campaignt that let’s people to know about their great new product and to help spread the word, they thought they would come up with a contest to give away some of this product. Target audience? 18-35 male and females

Now that they have a campaign idea, company X sits down to determine how best to go about this.

First off – they want to have a contest, they determine the best way to do this and to create a website that will host the contest and collect information on potential consumers. The objective? Begin a relationship with each person that enters the contest and ask for permission to continue the relationship by sending them enewsletters, coupons and so on to thank them for their entry. This would allow them the ability to create a database of interested consumers who have given permission and asked to hear more about their products.

They then looked back to their main campaign theme/objective and determined they still hadn’t completely met the objective of telling people about their product up front and creating awareness. They looked to see what their target audience was doing and realized that the main target consisted of users in Toronto and major urban cities and that many of these people either commuted to and from work in cars or on pblic transit. Knowing that iPods and digital devices were used more frequently than radio – they looked at doing an out of home campaign targeting users with billboards, wall murals and subway/transit domination in areas of Canada’s major cities that their target audience spent a lot of time passing. The objective of these ads were to show off the product and create awareness. They decided while to include a url, not to mention the contest given the contest served a different objective or purpose. In an effort to ensure people connected the two, they used the same tagline and same colour scheme for all of their campaign elements. The url drove people to the home page of their website, which had a house ad promoting the contest on the main page.

Now how to drive traffic for the contest itself in order to create that database? They decide some pay-per-click online advertising is the best approach. Some search engine ads and keyword lists – that spoke to the phrases used in the out of home campaign and general product category terms users were actually searching on to find similar products were created. Plus they added some basic demand gen web display advertising that simply focuses on driving people to their contest site. Nowhere in the ads did they talk about the product benefits – since that wasn’t the objective of that tactic. They chose not to advertise with large portals as they only wanted to pay for those people who clicked through to their site – achieving a large number of eyeballs wasn’t important to them in this campaign – not when the objective was to create a database.

As you can see, my ficticious company X took what some would call a different approach to their campaign.

Not every piece would look the same or carry the same message – but when put side by side, you can see how each piece could work together and fit together like a puzzle to create one overarching integrated campaign with tactics that that do more than just look nice together or like one another.

*Source: 2002 Merriam-Webster, Inc.